Morgan Lewis analysis finds US federal agencies are enforcing AI-related conduct using existing statutes while states move to enact AI-specific laws and expand antitrust, consumer protection, and false claims enforcement. The absence of a federal AI statute does not reduce …
Police1’s Leadership Institute released a free guide for police executives providing a framework for evaluating AI tools, establishing oversight mechanisms and integrating technology in a deliberate and governed manner. The publication addresses the legal and evidentiary risks of unmanaged AI …
The Register covers INTERPOL’s March 2026 financial fraud threat assessment in detail, noting that deepfake voice cloning using just a few seconds of sample audio is now routinely used for impersonation fraud, and that criminal networks are deploying AI to …
The European Commission confirmed that the EU AI Act’s requirements for high-risk AI systems — including AI used in law enforcement for evidence evaluation, crime risk profiling, remote biometric identification and predictive policing — will become fully applicable on 2 …
TechPolicy.Press analyses the structural gap in the EU AI Act’s coverage, noting that AI systems developed under the military exemption fall outside the Act’s risk-based framework while facial recognition and surveillance tools routinely migrate from military to civilian and law …
Vietnam’s Law on Artificial Intelligence took effect on 1 March 2026, making it the first Southeast Asian country with a standalone AI regime, including bans on high-risk AI applications and extraterritorial reach. South Korea’s AI Basic Act entered into force …
The Dutch Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) has published its Annual Plan 2026, identifying three strategic priorities for 2026–2028: countering mass surveillance, intensifying oversight of artificial intelligence, and strengthening digital resilience. In the law enforcement domain, the AP will continue inspections of …
A Future of Privacy Forum analysis of the EU AI Act’s Article 5(1)(d) prohibition clarifies that the ban on AI-based individual crime prediction applies regardless of whether one or many individuals are profiled simultaneously, and may extend to private entities …
New Zealand’s Biometric Processing Privacy Code, which entered into force on 3 November 2025, places strict requirements on all organisations handling biometric data including law enforcement, prohibiting high-risk uses such as emotion prediction and mass biometric scraping. Organisations already using …
Police forces across Africa are expanding digital capabilities at an accelerating pace. Lagos State Police Command activated an advanced surveillance system in January 2026, and Ethiopia has piloted fully unmanned smart police stations where civilians file complaints via touchscreen.
Morgan Lewis analysis finds US federal agencies are enforcing AI-related conduct using existing statutes while states move to enact AI-specific laws and expand antitrust, consumer protection, and false claims enforcement. The absence of a federal AI statute does not reduce …
Police1’s Leadership Institute released a free guide for police executives providing a framework for evaluating AI tools, establishing oversight mechanisms and integrating technology in a deliberate and governed manner. The publication addresses the legal and evidentiary risks of unmanaged AI …
The Register covers INTERPOL’s March 2026 financial fraud threat assessment in detail, noting that deepfake voice cloning using just a few seconds of sample audio is now routinely used for impersonation fraud, and that criminal networks are deploying AI to …
The European Commission confirmed that the EU AI Act’s requirements for high-risk AI systems — including AI used in law enforcement for evidence evaluation, crime risk profiling, remote biometric identification and predictive policing — will become fully applicable on 2 …
TechPolicy.Press analyses the structural gap in the EU AI Act’s coverage, noting that AI systems developed under the military exemption fall outside the Act’s risk-based framework while facial recognition and surveillance tools routinely migrate from military to civilian and law …
Vietnam’s Law on Artificial Intelligence took effect on 1 March 2026, making it the first Southeast Asian country with a standalone AI regime, including bans on high-risk AI applications and extraterritorial reach. South Korea’s AI Basic Act entered into force …
The Dutch Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) has published its Annual Plan 2026, identifying three strategic priorities for 2026–2028: countering mass surveillance, intensifying oversight of artificial intelligence, and strengthening digital resilience. In the law enforcement domain, the AP will continue inspections of …
A Future of Privacy Forum analysis of the EU AI Act’s Article 5(1)(d) prohibition clarifies that the ban on AI-based individual crime prediction applies regardless of whether one or many individuals are profiled simultaneously, and may extend to private entities …
New Zealand’s Biometric Processing Privacy Code, which entered into force on 3 November 2025, places strict requirements on all organisations handling biometric data including law enforcement, prohibiting high-risk uses such as emotion prediction and mass biometric scraping. Organisations already using …
Police forces across Africa are expanding digital capabilities at an accelerating pace. Lagos State Police Command activated an advanced surveillance system in January 2026, and Ethiopia has piloted fully unmanned smart police stations where civilians file complaints via touchscreen. Nigeria …